{
  "id": "CH09.P003",
  "oid": 223,
  "kind": "paragraph",
  "label": null,
  "work": "orthodoxy",
  "edition": "pg16769-r1",
  "work_metadata": {
    "title": "Orthodoxy",
    "authors": [
      "G. K. Chesterton"
    ],
    "description": "G. K. Chesterton's Orthodoxy (1908), his account of how he came to Christian belief: the full text with annotations, cited sources and commentary.",
    "original_publication_year": 1908,
    "alternate_titles": [],
    "subjects": [
      "Christian apologetics",
      "Christianity",
      "Philosophy of religion",
      "Paradox",
      "G. K. Chesterton",
      "English literature, 20th century"
    ],
    "metadata_version": 2,
    "metadata_updated_at": "2026-11-07T20:29:57Z"
  },
  "parent": "CH09",
  "ancestors": [
    "CH09"
  ],
  "prev": "CH09.P002",
  "next": "CH09.P004",
  "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH09.P003",
  "text": "The first answer is simply to say that I am a rationalist. I like to have some intellectual justification for my intuitions. If I am treating man as a fallen being it is an intellectual convenience to me to believe that he fell; and I find, for some odd psychological reason, that I can deal better with a man's exercise of freewill if I believe that he has got it. But I am in this matter yet more definitely a rationalist. I do not propose to turn this book into one of ordinary Christian apologetics; I should be glad to meet at any other time the enemies of Christianity in that more obvious arena. Here I am only giving an account of my own growth in spiritual certainty. But I may pause to remark that the more I saw of the merely abstract arguments against the Christian cosmology the less I thought of them. I mean that having found the moral atmosphere of the Incarnation to be common sense, I then looked at the established intellectual arguments against the Incarnation and found them to be common nonsense. In case the argument should be thought to suffer from the absence of the ordinary apologetic I will here very briefly summarise my own arguments and conclusions on the purely objective or scientific truth of the matter.",
  "length_cp": 1238,
  "sha256": "d65c9da28830dcc1e0f1bf1215154f781b6003a39e8fa3b14d65e813dde034ac",
  "children": [],
  "annotations": [
    {
      "id": "a_nv5t4p7o",
      "oid": 165598,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165599,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T18:51:18Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T18:51:18Z",
      "title": "The Incarnation's fittingness and the question of its truth",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH09.P003",
          "oid": 223,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH09.P003",
          "exact": "having found the moral atmosphere of the Incarnation to be common sense",
          "start": 828,
          "end": 899,
          "prefix": " I thought of them. I mean that ",
          "suffix": ", I then looked at the establish",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH09.P003#char=828,899"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-09-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P003",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Philosophical contextualization: then and since",
            "question": "What does Chesterton reclaim by calling himself a rationalist, and does a contemporary freethinker recognize the same distinction between a method and its conclusions?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Theological contextualization",
            "question": "How does the movement from the moral atmosphere of the Incarnation to its intellectual defence compare with theological arguments from fittingness?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_nv5t4p7o"
    },
    {
      "id": "a_5dzrc5gl",
      "oid": 165596,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165597,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T18:51:18Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T18:51:18Z",
      "title": "Rationalism as a method and as an unbelieving conclusion",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH09.P003",
          "oid": 223,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH09.P003",
          "exact": "The first answer is simply to say that I am a rationalist.",
          "start": 0,
          "end": 58,
          "prefix": "",
          "suffix": " I like to have some intellectua",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH09.P003#char=0,58"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-09-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P003",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Philosophical contextualization: then and since",
            "question": "What does Chesterton reclaim by calling himself a rationalist, and does a contemporary freethinker recognize the same distinction between a method and its conclusions?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Theological contextualization",
            "question": "How does the movement from the moral atmosphere of the Incarnation to its intellectual defence compare with theological arguments from fittingness?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_5dzrc5gl"
    }
  ],
  "annotations_next_cursor": null,
  "cited_by": [
    {
      "id": "a_x37jsdlc",
      "oid": 165708,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165709,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "title": "Learning to trust the garden: authority, evidence, and the recovery of joy",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH09",
          "oid": 12,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH09"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "argument-articles-restart-2026-11-07",
        "pass": "argument",
        "task": "Developing argument of chapter IX, Authority and the Adventurer",
        "object": "CH09",
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_x37jsdlc"
    }
  ],
  "cited_by_next_cursor": null
}