{
  "id": "CH08.P006",
  "oid": 199,
  "kind": "paragraph",
  "label": null,
  "work": "orthodoxy",
  "edition": "pg16769-r1",
  "work_metadata": {
    "title": "Orthodoxy",
    "authors": [
      "G. K. Chesterton"
    ],
    "description": "G. K. Chesterton's Orthodoxy (1908), his account of how he came to Christian belief: the full text with annotations, cited sources and commentary.",
    "original_publication_year": 1908,
    "alternate_titles": [],
    "subjects": [
      "Christian apologetics",
      "Christianity",
      "Philosophy of religion",
      "Paradox",
      "G. K. Chesterton",
      "English literature, 20th century"
    ],
    "metadata_version": 2,
    "metadata_updated_at": "2026-11-07T20:29:57Z"
  },
  "parent": "CH08",
  "ancestors": [
    "CH08"
  ],
  "prev": "CH08.P005",
  "next": "CH08.P007",
  "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH08.P006",
  "text": "I take the most obvious instance first, the case of miracles. For some extraordinary reason, there is a fixed notion that it is more liberal to disbelieve in miracles than to believe in them. Why, I cannot imagine, nor can anybody tell me. For some inconceivable cause a \"broad\" or \"liberal\" clergyman always means a man who wishes at least to diminish the number of miracles; it never means a man who wishes to increase that number. It always means a man who is free to disbelieve that Christ came out of His grave; it never means a man who is free to believe that his own aunt came out of her grave. It is common to find trouble in a parish because the parish priest cannot admit that St. Peter walked on water; yet how rarely do we find trouble in a parish because the clergyman says that his father walked on the Serpentine? And this is not because (as the swift secularist debater would immediately retort) miracles cannot be believed in our experience. It is not because \"miracles do not happen,\" as in the dogma which Matthew Arnold recited with simple faith. More supernatural things are _alleged_ to have happened in our time than would have been possible eighty years ago. Men of science believe in such marvels much more than they did: the most perplexing, and even horrible, prodigies of mind and spirit are always being unveiled in modern psychology. Things that the old science at least would frankly have rejected as miracles are hourly being asserted by the new science. The only thing which is still old-fashioned enough to reject miracles is the New Theology. But in truth this notion that it is \"free\" to deny miracles has nothing to do with the evidence for or against them. It is a lifeless verbal prejudice of which the original life and beginning was not in the freedom of thought, but simply in the dogma of materialism. The man of the nineteenth century did not disbelieve in the Resurrection because his liberal Christianity allowed him to doubt it. He disbelieved in it because his very strict materialism did not allow him to believe it. Tennyson, a very typical nineteenth-century man, uttered one of the instinctive truisms of his contemporaries when he said that there was faith in their honest doubt. There was indeed. Those words have a profound and even a horrible truth. In their doubt of miracles there was a faith in a fixed and godless fate; a deep and sincere faith in the incurable routine of the cosmos. The doubts of the agnostic were only the dogmas of the monist.",
  "length_cp": 2507,
  "sha256": "3cf17ce308cb284badf2a4d395698c2c225ea11fc88b7f90e21e531ccd0ef7f1",
  "children": [],
  "annotations": [
    {
      "id": "a_soeu5plu",
      "oid": 165510,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165511,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T18:31:03Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T18:31:03Z",
      "title": "Psychical research opened a question rather than proving miracles",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH08.P006",
          "oid": 199,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH08.P006",
          "exact": "the most perplexing, and even horrible, prodigies of mind and spirit are always being unveiled in modern psychology",
          "start": 1247,
          "end": 1362,
          "prefix": "arvels much more than they did: ",
          "suffix": ". Things that the old science at",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH08.P006#char=1247,1362"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-08-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P006",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Quotations and attributions",
            "question": "Where did Arnold say that miracles do not happen, and what purpose did that denial serve?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Quotations and attributions",
            "question": "What happens to Tennyson's honest doubt when its original context is restored?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Interlocutors and historical debates",
            "question": "What contemporary scientific discussion makes the appeal to modern psychology intelligible, and what does it actually establish?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_soeu5plu"
    },
    {
      "id": "a_dj37ebpm",
      "oid": 165508,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165509,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T18:31:03Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T18:31:03Z",
      "title": "Tennyson's doubt ends in a stronger faith",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH08.P006",
          "oid": 199,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH08.P006",
          "exact": "there was faith in their honest doubt",
          "start": 2194,
          "end": 2231,
          "prefix": "ontemporaries when he said that ",
          "suffix": ". There was indeed. Those words ",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH08.P006#char=2194,2231"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-08-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P006",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Quotations and attributions",
            "question": "Where did Arnold say that miracles do not happen, and what purpose did that denial serve?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Quotations and attributions",
            "question": "What happens to Tennyson's honest doubt when its original context is restored?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Interlocutors and historical debates",
            "question": "What contemporary scientific discussion makes the appeal to modern psychology intelligible, and what does it actually establish?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_dj37ebpm"
    },
    {
      "id": "a_5hfcmwr6",
      "oid": 165506,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165507,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T18:31:03Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T18:31:03Z",
      "title": "Arnold's Christianity without miraculous credentials",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH08.P006",
          "oid": 199,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH08.P006",
          "exact": "\"miracles do not happen,\" as in the dogma which Matthew Arnold recited with simple faith",
          "start": 977,
          "end": 1065,
          "prefix": "r experience. It is not because ",
          "suffix": ". More supernatural things are _",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH08.P006#char=977,1065"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-08-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P006",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Quotations and attributions",
            "question": "Where did Arnold say that miracles do not happen, and what purpose did that denial serve?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Quotations and attributions",
            "question": "What happens to Tennyson's honest doubt when its original context is restored?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Interlocutors and historical debates",
            "question": "What contemporary scientific discussion makes the appeal to modern psychology intelligible, and what does it actually establish?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_5hfcmwr6"
    }
  ],
  "annotations_next_cursor": null,
  "cited_by": [
    {
      "id": "a_rf4hlvbl",
      "oid": 165706,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165707,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "title": "The freedom concealed in dogma: orthodoxy as a resource for reform",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH08",
          "oid": 11,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH08"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "argument-articles-restart-2026-11-07",
        "pass": "argument",
        "task": "Developing argument of chapter VIII, The Romance of Orthodoxy",
        "object": "CH08",
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_rf4hlvbl"
    }
  ],
  "cited_by_next_cursor": null
}