{
  "id": "CH08.P005",
  "oid": 198,
  "kind": "paragraph",
  "label": null,
  "work": "orthodoxy",
  "edition": "pg16769-r1",
  "work_metadata": {
    "title": "Orthodoxy",
    "authors": [
      "G. K. Chesterton"
    ],
    "description": "G. K. Chesterton's Orthodoxy (1908), his account of how he came to Christian belief: the full text with annotations, cited sources and commentary.",
    "original_publication_year": 1908,
    "alternate_titles": [],
    "subjects": [
      "Christian apologetics",
      "Christianity",
      "Philosophy of religion",
      "Paradox",
      "G. K. Chesterton",
      "English literature, 20th century"
    ],
    "metadata_version": 2,
    "metadata_updated_at": "2026-11-07T20:29:57Z"
  },
  "parent": "CH08",
  "ancestors": [
    "CH08"
  ],
  "prev": "CH08.P004",
  "next": "CH08.P006",
  "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH08.P005",
  "text": "Now let us take in order the innovations that are the notes of the new theology or the modernist church. We concluded the last chapter with the discovery of one of them. The very doctrine which is called the most old-fashioned was found to be the only safeguard of the new democracies of the earth. The doctrine seemingly most unpopular was found to be the only strength of the people. In short, we found that the only logical negation of oligarchy was in the affirmation of original sin. So it is, I maintain, in all the other cases.",
  "length_cp": 534,
  "sha256": "e804d5fc321613e167c559421e22c0c24d472b1c3759a4d9e7495c930938bc64",
  "children": [],
  "annotations": [
    {
      "id": "a_n75e33g3",
      "oid": 165504,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165505,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T18:31:03Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T18:31:03Z",
      "title": "Distrusting rulers without a doctrine of inherited sin",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH08.P005",
          "oid": 198,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH08.P005",
          "exact": "the only logical negation of oligarchy was in the affirmation of original sin",
          "start": 410,
          "end": 487,
          "prefix": "people. In short, we found that ",
          "suffix": ". So it is, I maintain, in all t",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH08.P005#char=410,487"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-08-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P005",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Interlocutors and historical debates",
            "question": "What did Campbell's New Theology actually say about the Fall and social emancipation?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Philosophical contextualization: then and since",
            "question": "Does the political argument from human fallibility require the theological doctrine of original sin?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_n75e33g3"
    },
    {
      "id": "a_slikfeik",
      "oid": 165502,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165503,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T18:31:03Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T18:31:03Z",
      "title": "Denying the Fall without denying sin",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH08.P005",
          "oid": 198,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH08.P005",
          "exact": "the innovations that are the notes of the new theology or the modernist church",
          "start": 25,
          "end": 103,
          "prefix": "Now let us take in order ",
          "suffix": ". We concluded the last chapter ",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH08.P005#char=25,103"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-08-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P005",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Interlocutors and historical debates",
            "question": "What did Campbell's New Theology actually say about the Fall and social emancipation?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Philosophical contextualization: then and since",
            "question": "Does the political argument from human fallibility require the theological doctrine of original sin?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_slikfeik"
    }
  ],
  "annotations_next_cursor": null,
  "cited_by": [
    {
      "id": "a_rf4hlvbl",
      "oid": 165706,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165707,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "title": "The freedom concealed in dogma: orthodoxy as a resource for reform",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH08",
          "oid": 11,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH08"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "argument-articles-restart-2026-11-07",
        "pass": "argument",
        "task": "Developing argument of chapter VIII, The Romance of Orthodoxy",
        "object": "CH08",
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_rf4hlvbl"
    }
  ],
  "cited_by_next_cursor": null
}