{
  "id": "CH07.P005",
  "oid": 161,
  "kind": "paragraph",
  "label": null,
  "work": "orthodoxy",
  "edition": "pg16769-r1",
  "work_metadata": {
    "title": "Orthodoxy",
    "authors": [
      "G. K. Chesterton"
    ],
    "description": "G. K. Chesterton's Orthodoxy (1908), his account of how he came to Christian belief: the full text with annotations, cited sources and commentary.",
    "original_publication_year": 1908,
    "alternate_titles": [],
    "subjects": [
      "Christian apologetics",
      "Christianity",
      "Philosophy of religion",
      "Paradox",
      "G. K. Chesterton",
      "English literature, 20th century"
    ],
    "metadata_version": 2,
    "metadata_updated_at": "2026-11-07T20:29:57Z"
  },
  "parent": "CH07",
  "ancestors": [
    "CH07"
  ],
  "prev": "CH07.P004",
  "next": "CH07.P006",
  "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH07.P005",
  "text": "Some fall back simply on the clock: they talk as if mere passage through time brought some superiority; so that even a man of the first mental calibre carelessly uses the phrase that human morality is never up to date. How can anything be up to date? a date has no character. How can one say that Christmas celebrations are not suitable to the twenty-fifth of a month? What the writer meant, of course, was that the majority is behind his favourite minority--or in front of it. Other vague modern people take refuge in material metaphors; in fact, this is the chief mark of vague modern people. Not daring to define their doctrine of what is good, they use physical figures of speech without stint or shame, and, what is worst of all, seem to think these cheap analogies are exquisitely spiritual and superior to the old morality. Thus they think it intellectual to talk about things being \"high.\" It is at least the reverse of intellectual; it is a mere phrase from a steeple or a weathercock. \"Tommy was a good boy\" is a pure philosophical statement, worthy of Plato or Aquinas. \"Tommy lived the higher life\" is a gross metaphor from a ten-foot rule.",
  "length_cp": 1152,
  "sha256": "0814e34ea70504d9fe4f60a871085d679f70fa5c26c41da0237d65915f1954a7",
  "children": [],
  "annotations": [
    {
      "id": "a_azf3nsoa",
      "oid": 165376,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165377,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T18:08:03Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T18:08:03Z",
      "title": "Being current and being better are different claims",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH07.P005",
          "oid": 161,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH07.P005",
          "exact": "How can anything be up to date? a date has no character.",
          "start": 219,
          "end": 275,
          "prefix": "n morality is never up to date. ",
          "suffix": " How can one say that Christmas ",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH07.P005#char=219,275"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-07-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P005",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Quotations and attributions",
            "question": "Can the unnamed writer's claim that morality is never up to date be located, and does its original context support Chesterton's reading?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Connections across Chesterton’s works",
            "question": "Does Chesterton elsewhere qualify his objection to being up to date and explain why progress requires a defined good?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_azf3nsoa"
    },
    {
      "id": "a_ctnvt4vg",
      "oid": 165374,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165375,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T18:08:03Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T18:08:03Z",
      "title": "A probable Shaw allusion: moral codes lag behind individual judgment",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH07.P005",
          "oid": 161,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH07.P005",
          "exact": "human morality is never up to date",
          "start": 183,
          "end": 217,
          "prefix": "carelessly uses the phrase that ",
          "suffix": ". How can anything be up to date",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH07.P005#char=183,217"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-07-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P005",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Quotations and attributions",
            "question": "Can the unnamed writer's claim that morality is never up to date be located, and does its original context support Chesterton's reading?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Connections across Chesterton’s works",
            "question": "Does Chesterton elsewhere qualify his objection to being up to date and explain why progress requires a defined good?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_ctnvt4vg"
    }
  ],
  "annotations_next_cursor": null,
  "cited_by": [
    {
      "id": "a_aogcpbn4",
      "oid": 165704,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165705,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "title": "A fixed ideal and the permanent work of reform",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH07",
          "oid": 10,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH07"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "argument-articles-restart-2026-11-07",
        "pass": "argument",
        "task": "Developing argument of chapter VII, The Eternal Revolution",
        "object": "CH07",
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_aogcpbn4"
    }
  ],
  "cited_by_next_cursor": null
}