{
  "id": "CH04.P026",
  "oid": 91,
  "kind": "paragraph",
  "label": null,
  "work": "orthodoxy",
  "edition": "pg16769-r1",
  "work_metadata": {
    "title": "Orthodoxy",
    "authors": [
      "G. K. Chesterton"
    ],
    "description": "G. K. Chesterton's Orthodoxy (1908), his account of how he came to Christian belief: the full text with annotations, cited sources and commentary.",
    "original_publication_year": 1908,
    "alternate_titles": [],
    "subjects": [
      "Christian apologetics",
      "Christianity",
      "Philosophy of religion",
      "Paradox",
      "G. K. Chesterton",
      "English literature, 20th century"
    ],
    "metadata_version": 2,
    "metadata_updated_at": "2026-11-07T20:29:57Z"
  },
  "parent": "CH04",
  "ancestors": [
    "CH04"
  ],
  "prev": "CH04.P025",
  "next": "CH04.P027",
  "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH04.P026",
  "text": "This was my first conviction; made by the shock of my childish emotions meeting the modern creed in mid-career. I had always vaguely felt facts to be miracles in the sense that they are wonderful: now I began to think them miracles in the stricter sense that they were _wilful_. I mean that they were, or might be, repeated exercises of some will. In short, I had always believed that the world involved magic: now I thought that perhaps it involved a magician. And this pointed a profound emotion always present and sub-conscious; that this world of ours has some purpose; and if there is a purpose, there is a person. I had always felt life first as a story: and if there is a story there is a story-teller.",
  "length_cp": 709,
  "sha256": "412a57e607927efc791fd2400d03b4444b19f1d9172523bf552f10f869c2951d",
  "children": [],
  "annotations": [
    {
      "id": "a_hohdyldc",
      "oid": 165142,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165143,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T16:59:23Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T16:59:23Z",
      "title": "Divine willing and miracles are different theological claims",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH04.P026",
          "oid": 91,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH04.P026",
          "exact": "miracles in the stricter sense that they were _wilful_",
          "start": 223,
          "end": 277,
          "prefix": "rful: now I began to think them ",
          "suffix": ". I mean that they were, or migh",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH04.P026#char=223,277"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-04-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P026",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Philosophical contextualization: then and since",
            "question": "Does treating natural regularity as repeated willing have a precise philosophical counterpart, and what would that comparison commit Chesterton to?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Theological contextualization",
            "question": "Is calling ordinary facts miracles because they are willed equivalent to the theological definition of a miracle?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_hohdyldc"
    },
    {
      "id": "a_ltpz3yjq",
      "oid": 165140,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165141,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T16:59:23Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T16:59:23Z",
      "title": "Natural laws as a will's regular methods",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH04.P026",
          "oid": 91,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH04.P026",
          "exact": "repeated exercises of some will",
          "start": 315,
          "end": 346,
          "prefix": "an that they were, or might be, ",
          "suffix": ". In short, I had always believe",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH04.P026#char=315,346"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-04-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P026",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Philosophical contextualization: then and since",
            "question": "Does treating natural regularity as repeated willing have a precise philosophical counterpart, and what would that comparison commit Chesterton to?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Theological contextualization",
            "question": "Is calling ordinary facts miracles because they are willed equivalent to the theological definition of a miracle?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_ltpz3yjq"
    }
  ],
  "annotations_next_cursor": null,
  "cited_by": [
    {
      "id": "a_ezv4y2k6",
      "oid": 165698,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165699,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "title": "A world that might not have been: wonder, gratitude, and the discipline of joy",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH04",
          "oid": 7,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH04"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "argument-articles-restart-2026-11-07",
        "pass": "argument",
        "task": "Developing argument of chapter IV, The Ethics of Elfland",
        "object": "CH04",
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_ezv4y2k6"
    }
  ],
  "cited_by_next_cursor": null
}