{
  "id": "CH04.P010",
  "oid": 75,
  "kind": "paragraph",
  "label": null,
  "work": "orthodoxy",
  "edition": "pg16769-r1",
  "work_metadata": {
    "title": "Orthodoxy",
    "authors": [
      "G. K. Chesterton"
    ],
    "description": "G. K. Chesterton's Orthodoxy (1908), his account of how he came to Christian belief: the full text with annotations, cited sources and commentary.",
    "original_publication_year": 1908,
    "alternate_titles": [],
    "subjects": [
      "Christian apologetics",
      "Christianity",
      "Philosophy of religion",
      "Paradox",
      "G. K. Chesterton",
      "English literature, 20th century"
    ],
    "metadata_version": 2,
    "metadata_updated_at": "2026-11-07T20:29:57Z"
  },
  "parent": "CH04",
  "ancestors": [
    "CH04"
  ],
  "prev": "CH04.P009",
  "next": "CH04.P011",
  "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH04.P010",
  "text": "Here is the peculiar perfection of tone and truth in the nursery tales. The man of science says, \"Cut the stalk, and the apple will fall\"; but he says it calmly, as if the one idea really led up to the other. The witch in the fairy tale says, \"Blow the horn, and the ogre's castle will fall\"; but she does not say it as if it were something in which the effect obviously arose out of the cause. Doubtless she has given the advice to many champions, and has seen many castles fall, but she does not lose either her wonder or her reason. She does not muddle her head until it imagines a necessary mental connection between a horn and a falling tower. But the scientific men do muddle their heads, until they imagine a necessary mental connection between an apple leaving the tree and an apple reaching the ground. They do really talk as if they had found not only a set of marvellous facts, but a truth connecting those facts. They do talk as if the connection of two strange things physically connected them philosophically. They feel that because one incomprehensible thing constantly follows another incomprehensible thing the two together somehow make up a comprehensible thing. Two black riddles make a white answer.",
  "length_cp": 1219,
  "sha256": "80cc601838a7a2aa869f7428eedb83eb9ebdddc385157bf71584c4182ad946c9",
  "children": [],
  "annotations": [
    {
      "id": "a_kapllz26",
      "oid": 165088,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165089,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T16:59:22Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T16:59:22Z",
      "title": "Newton's laws leave gravity's cause unexplained",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH04.P010",
          "oid": 75,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH04.P010",
          "exact": "not only a set of marvellous facts, but a truth connecting those facts",
          "start": 853,
          "end": 923,
          "prefix": "eally talk as if they had found ",
          "suffix": ". They do talk as if the connect",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH04.P010#char=853,923"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-04-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P010",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Philosophical contextualization: then and since",
            "question": "How closely does the distinction between repeated succession and intelligible necessity resemble Hume's account of causation?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Interlocutors and historical debates",
            "question": "Does Newton himself claim the kind of complete intelligibility attributed to scientific men?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_kapllz26"
    },
    {
      "id": "a_x4oj6ia3",
      "oid": 165086,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165087,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T16:59:22Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T16:59:22Z",
      "title": "The witch's caution and Hume's necessary connection",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH04.P010",
          "oid": 75,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH04.P010",
          "exact": "a necessary mental connection between a horn and a falling tower",
          "start": 583,
          "end": 647,
          "prefix": "ddle her head until it imagines ",
          "suffix": ". But the scientific men do mudd",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH04.P010#char=583,647"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-04-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P010",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Philosophical contextualization: then and since",
            "question": "How closely does the distinction between repeated succession and intelligible necessity resemble Hume's account of causation?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Interlocutors and historical debates",
            "question": "Does Newton himself claim the kind of complete intelligibility attributed to scientific men?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_x4oj6ia3"
    }
  ],
  "annotations_next_cursor": null,
  "cited_by": [
    {
      "id": "a_5hvc6pyt",
      "oid": 165710,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165711,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T19:11:19Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T19:11:19Z",
      "title": "A home large enough for discovery: the developing argument of Orthodoxy",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "scope": "work",
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "oid": 2,
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "argument-articles-restart-2026-11-07",
        "pass": "argument",
        "task": "Developing argument of the whole of Orthodoxy",
        "object": "BOOK",
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_5hvc6pyt"
    },
    {
      "id": "a_ezv4y2k6",
      "oid": 165698,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165699,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "title": "A world that might not have been: wonder, gratitude, and the discipline of joy",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH04",
          "oid": 7,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH04"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "argument-articles-restart-2026-11-07",
        "pass": "argument",
        "task": "Developing argument of chapter IV, The Ethics of Elfland",
        "object": "CH04",
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_ezv4y2k6"
    }
  ],
  "cited_by_next_cursor": null
}