{
  "id": "CH03.P011",
  "oid": 49,
  "kind": "paragraph",
  "label": null,
  "work": "orthodoxy",
  "edition": "pg16769-r1",
  "work_metadata": {
    "title": "Orthodoxy",
    "authors": [
      "G. K. Chesterton"
    ],
    "description": "G. K. Chesterton's Orthodoxy (1908), his account of how he came to Christian belief: the full text with annotations, cited sources and commentary.",
    "original_publication_year": 1908,
    "alternate_titles": [],
    "subjects": [
      "Christian apologetics",
      "Christianity",
      "Philosophy of religion",
      "Paradox",
      "G. K. Chesterton",
      "English literature, 20th century"
    ],
    "metadata_version": 2,
    "metadata_updated_at": "2026-11-07T20:29:57Z"
  },
  "parent": "CH03",
  "ancestors": [
    "CH03"
  ],
  "prev": "CH03.P010",
  "next": "CH03.P012",
  "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH03.P011",
  "text": "Evolution is a good example of that modern intelligence which, if it destroys anything, destroys itself. Evolution is either an innocent scientific description of how certain earthly things came about; or, if it is anything more than this, it is an attack upon thought itself. If evolution destroys anything, it does not destroy religion but rationalism. If evolution simply means that a positive thing called an ape turned very slowly into a positive thing called a man, then it is stingless for the most orthodox; for a personal God might just as well do things slowly as quickly, especially if, like the Christian God, he were outside time. But if it means anything more, it means that there is no such thing as an ape to change, and no such thing as a man for him to change into. It means that there is no such thing as a thing. At best, there is only one thing, and that is a flux of everything and anything. This is an attack not upon the faith, but upon the mind; you cannot think if there are no things to think about. You cannot think if you are not separate from the subject of thought. Descartes said, \"I think; therefore I am.\" The philosophic evolutionist reverses and negatives the epigram. He says, \"I am not; therefore I cannot think.\"",
  "length_cp": 1251,
  "sha256": "66235703928fef91345d6cb12a37aa801eaac22ada4881905ec12605714e54fc",
  "children": [],
  "annotations": [
    {
      "id": "a_mtns625k",
      "oid": 164996,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 164997,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T16:33:54Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T16:33:54Z",
      "title": "The cogito survives the attempt to doubt it",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH03.P011",
          "oid": 49,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH03.P011",
          "exact": "Descartes said, \"I think; therefore I am.\"",
          "start": 1097,
          "end": 1139,
          "prefix": "te from the subject of thought. ",
          "suffix": " The philosophic evolutionist re",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH03.P011#char=1097,1139"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-03-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P011",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Philosophical contextualization: then and since",
            "question": "Does Darwin's account of changing species entail Chesterton's denial of distinguishable things?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Quotations and attributions",
            "question": "What does Descartes's maxim establish in its original argumentative context?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_mtns625k"
    },
    {
      "id": "a_np5jeobn",
      "oid": 164994,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 164995,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T16:33:54Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T16:33:54Z",
      "title": "Changing species and the existence of things",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH03.P011",
          "oid": 49,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH03.P011",
          "exact": "It means that there is no such thing as a thing.",
          "start": 784,
          "end": 832,
          "prefix": "s a man for him to change into. ",
          "suffix": " At best, there is only one thin",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH03.P011#char=784,832"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-03-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P011",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Philosophical contextualization: then and since",
            "question": "Does Darwin's account of changing species entail Chesterton's denial of distinguishable things?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Quotations and attributions",
            "question": "What does Descartes's maxim establish in its original argumentative context?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_np5jeobn"
    }
  ],
  "annotations_next_cursor": null,
  "cited_by": [
    {
      "id": "a_mt5b4zsl",
      "oid": 165696,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165697,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "title": "What thought and choice need: from scattered virtues to a seamless character",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH03",
          "oid": 6,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH03"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "argument-articles-restart-2026-11-07",
        "pass": "argument",
        "task": "Developing argument of chapter III, The Suicide of Thought",
        "object": "CH03",
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_mt5b4zsl"
    }
  ],
  "cited_by_next_cursor": null
}