{
  "id": "CH03.P010",
  "oid": 48,
  "kind": "paragraph",
  "label": null,
  "work": "orthodoxy",
  "edition": "pg16769-r1",
  "work_metadata": {
    "title": "Orthodoxy",
    "authors": [
      "G. K. Chesterton"
    ],
    "description": "G. K. Chesterton's Orthodoxy (1908), his account of how he came to Christian belief: the full text with annotations, cited sources and commentary.",
    "original_publication_year": 1908,
    "alternate_titles": [],
    "subjects": [
      "Christian apologetics",
      "Christianity",
      "Philosophy of religion",
      "Paradox",
      "G. K. Chesterton",
      "English literature, 20th century"
    ],
    "metadata_version": 2,
    "metadata_updated_at": "2026-11-07T20:29:57Z"
  },
  "parent": "CH03",
  "ancestors": [
    "CH03"
  ],
  "prev": "CH03.P009",
  "next": "CH03.P011",
  "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH03.P010",
  "text": "Lest this should be called loose assertion, it is perhaps desirable, though dull, to run rapidly through the chief modern fashions of thought which have this effect of stopping thought itself. Materialism and the view of everything as a personal illusion have some such effect; for if the mind is mechanical, thought cannot be very exciting, and if the cosmos is unreal, there is nothing to think about. But in these cases the effect is indirect and doubtful. In some cases it is direct and clear; notably in the case of what is generally called evolution.",
  "length_cp": 556,
  "sha256": "6a110fd0f660dfc71a54019815e82b0bc4b2c919860e52158b89db169f08abe9",
  "children": [],
  "annotations": [
    {
      "id": "a_dfbruxib",
      "oid": 164992,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 164993,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T16:33:54Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T16:33:54Z",
      "title": "Mechanical thought and the possibility of inquiry",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH03.P010",
          "oid": 48,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH03.P010",
          "exact": "if the mind is mechanical, thought cannot be very exciting",
          "start": 282,
          "end": 340,
          "prefix": "sion have some such effect; for ",
          "suffix": ", and if the cosmos is unreal, t",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH03.P010#char=282,340"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-03-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P010",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Philosophical contextualization: then and since",
            "question": "Does treating perceived things as ideas necessarily make the cosmos a personal illusion?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Interlocutors and historical debates",
            "question": "What distinction does Huxley's conscious automatism draw between mechanism, materialism, and the continued practice of reasoning?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_dfbruxib"
    },
    {
      "id": "a_xlxlj5xc",
      "oid": 164990,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 164991,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T16:33:54Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T16:33:54Z",
      "title": "A world of ideas need not be a private illusion",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH03.P010",
          "oid": 48,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH03.P010",
          "exact": "the view of everything as a personal illusion",
          "start": 209,
          "end": 254,
          "prefix": "thought itself. Materialism and ",
          "suffix": " have some such effect; for if t",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH03.P010#char=209,254"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-03-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P010",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Philosophical contextualization: then and since",
            "question": "Does treating perceived things as ideas necessarily make the cosmos a personal illusion?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Interlocutors and historical debates",
            "question": "What distinction does Huxley's conscious automatism draw between mechanism, materialism, and the continued practice of reasoning?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_xlxlj5xc"
    }
  ],
  "annotations_next_cursor": null,
  "cited_by": [
    {
      "id": "a_mt5b4zsl",
      "oid": 165696,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165697,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "title": "What thought and choice need: from scattered virtues to a seamless character",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH03",
          "oid": 6,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH03"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "argument-articles-restart-2026-11-07",
        "pass": "argument",
        "task": "Developing argument of chapter III, The Suicide of Thought",
        "object": "CH03",
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_mt5b4zsl"
    }
  ],
  "cited_by_next_cursor": null
}