{
  "id": "CH02.P002",
  "oid": 20,
  "kind": "paragraph",
  "label": null,
  "work": "orthodoxy",
  "edition": "pg16769-r1",
  "work_metadata": {
    "title": "Orthodoxy",
    "authors": [
      "G. K. Chesterton"
    ],
    "description": "G. K. Chesterton's Orthodoxy (1908), his account of how he came to Christian belief: the full text with annotations, cited sources and commentary.",
    "original_publication_year": 1908,
    "alternate_titles": [],
    "subjects": [
      "Christian apologetics",
      "Christianity",
      "Philosophy of religion",
      "Paradox",
      "G. K. Chesterton",
      "English literature, 20th century"
    ],
    "metadata_version": 2,
    "metadata_updated_at": "2026-11-07T20:29:57Z"
  },
  "parent": "CH02",
  "ancestors": [
    "CH02"
  ],
  "prev": "CH02.P001",
  "next": "CH02.P003",
  "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH02.P002",
  "text": "But I think this book may well start where our argument started--in the neighbourhood of the mad-house. Modern masters of science are much impressed with the need of beginning all inquiry with a fact. The ancient masters of religion were quite equally impressed with that necessity. They began with the fact of sin--a fact as practical as potatoes. Whether or no man could be washed in miraculous waters, there was no doubt at any rate that he wanted washing. But certain religious leaders in London, not mere materialists, have begun in our day not to deny the highly disputable water, but to deny the indisputable dirt. Certain new theologians dispute original sin, which is the only part of Christian theology which can really be proved. Some followers of the Reverend R.J. Campbell, in their almost too fastidious spirituality, admit divine sinlessness, which they cannot see even in their dreams. But they essentially deny human sin, which they can see in the street. The strongest saints and the strongest sceptics alike took positive evil as the starting-point of their argument. If it be true (as it certainly is) that a man can feel exquisite happiness in skinning a cat, then the religious philosopher can only draw one of two deductions. He must either deny the existence of God, as all atheists do; or he must deny the present union between God and man, as all Christians do. The new theologians seem to think it a highly rationalistic solution to deny the cat.",
  "length_cp": 1473,
  "sha256": "e6f69e1858e56155a2dcb41b76a8a6da95f162024f53bf5122fdbb3dad4d2e57",
  "children": [],
  "annotations": [
    {
      "id": "a_runsnhlt",
      "oid": 164878,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 164879,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T16:10:56Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T16:10:56Z",
      "title": "What the visible dirt proves",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH02.P002",
          "oid": 20,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH02.P002",
          "exact": "original sin, which is the only part of Christian theology which can really be proved",
          "start": 654,
          "end": 739,
          "prefix": "Certain new theologians dispute ",
          "suffix": ". Some followers of the Reverend",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH02.P002#char=654,739"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-02-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P002",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Interlocutors and historical debates",
            "question": "What did Campbell actually deny, and how fairly does the cat argument represent him?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Theological contextualization",
            "question": "Does observable wrongdoing prove original sin in its doctrinal sense?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_runsnhlt"
    },
    {
      "id": "a_ploot7sm",
      "oid": 164876,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 164877,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T16:10:56Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T16:10:56Z",
      "title": "Campbell denied a historical Fall, not the existence of wrongdoing",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH02.P002",
          "oid": 20,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "paragraph": "CH02.P002",
          "exact": "Some followers of the Reverend R.J. Campbell",
          "start": 741,
          "end": 785,
          "prefix": "ogy which can really be proved. ",
          "suffix": ", in their almost too fastidious",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH02.P002#char=741,785"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "chapter-02-restart-2026-11-07",
        "paragraph_investigator": "P002",
        "task": [
          {
            "approach": "Interlocutors and historical debates",
            "question": "What did Campbell actually deny, and how fairly does the cat argument represent him?"
          },
          {
            "approach": "Theological contextualization",
            "question": "Does observable wrongdoing prove original sin in its doctrinal sense?"
          }
        ],
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_ploot7sm"
    }
  ],
  "annotations_next_cursor": null,
  "cited_by": [
    {
      "id": "a_avnsjprz",
      "oid": 165694,
      "revision": 1,
      "revision_oid": 165695,
      "created_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "updated_at": "2026-11-07T19:04:35Z",
      "title": "What a complete explanation can leave out",
      "work": "orthodoxy",
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "anchors": [
        {
          "unit": "CH02",
          "oid": 5,
          "role": null,
          "edition": "pg16769-r1",
          "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH02"
        }
      ],
      "metadata": {
        "run": "argument-articles-restart-2026-11-07",
        "pass": "argument",
        "task": "Developing argument of chapter II, The Maniac",
        "object": "CH02",
        "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
      },
      "url": "/a/a_avnsjprz"
    }
  ],
  "cited_by_next_cursor": null
}