{
  "id": "a_qhunclou",
  "oid": 165378,
  "revision": 1,
  "revision_oid": 165379,
  "work": "orthodoxy",
  "edition": "pg16769-r1",
  "title": "Beyond one opposition, rather than beyond every valuation",
  "anchors": [
    {
      "unit": "CH07.P006",
      "oid": 162,
      "role": null,
      "edition": "pg16769-r1",
      "paragraph": "CH07.P006",
      "exact": "He said, \"beyond good and evil,\" because he had not the courage to say, \"more good than good and evil,\" or, \"more evil than good and evil.\"",
      "start": 486,
      "end": 625,
      "prefix": "phor, like a cheery minor poet. ",
      "suffix": " Had he faced his thought withou",
      "url": "/orthodoxy/pg16769-r1/CH07.P006#char=486,625"
    }
  ],
  "body_markdown": "Nietzsche explicitly distinguishes rejecting the opposition good/evil from abandoning discrimination between good and bad. At the end of the first essay of *The Genealogy of Morals* (1887), he explains his earlier title: it is not the same as being beyond good and bad. Chesterton's alternatives therefore assume precisely what Nietzsche disputes: that any defensible judgment must remain within the inherited good/evil opposition. [First essay, §17](https://www.gutenberg.org/files/52319/52319-h/52319-h.htm).\n\nThis does not establish Nietzsche's rival valuation as sound. It does mean that calling the formula nonsense passes over its stated distinction. *Beyond Good and Evil* (1886), §260, contrasts noble self-valuation with slave morality and describes pride, self-command and generosity from abundance. Those commitments can be criticized; they are more definite than mere altitude. [§260](https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4363/4363-h/4363-h.htm). The witnesses used here are the later Samuel translation (1913) and Gutenberg's Zimmern text derived from the 1909–1913 collected edition, not evidence of the editions Chesterton read.",
  "sources": [
    {
      "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/files/52319/52319-h/52319-h.htm",
      "title": "Nietzsche, The Genealogy of Morals, translated Horace B. Samuel, 1913",
      "locator": "First Essay §17, printed p.57; title page and editor's note",
      "exact": null
    },
    {
      "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4363/4363-h/4363-h.htm",
      "title": "Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, translated Helen Zimmern",
      "locator": "§260; transcriber's edition note",
      "exact": null
    }
  ],
  "citations": [],
  "external_references": [
    {
      "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/files/52319/52319-h/52319-h.htm",
      "title": "First essay, §17"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4363/4363-h/4363-h.htm",
      "title": "§260"
    }
  ],
  "limits": [
    "No claim that these later English witnesses were Chesterton's sources; the German argument predates Orthodoxy."
  ],
  "metadata": {
    "run": "chapter-07-restart-2026-11-07",
    "paragraph_investigator": "P006",
    "task": [
      {
        "approach": "Philosophical contextualization: then and since",
        "question": "Does beyond good and evil abolish evaluation, or distinguish kinds of evaluation?"
      },
      {
        "approach": "Quotations and attributions",
        "question": "How does Nietzsche's own presentation of his ideal bear on the charge that over-man is merely a physical metaphor?"
      }
    ],
    "model": "gpt-6.1-sol"
  },
  "content_sha256": "sha256:13f1e4b6bb2af179574894b91ff12a5d99b79b6d9c52ddb1d2a7c4e511f90954",
  "created_at": "2026-11-07T18:08:03Z",
  "is_current": true,
  "url": "/a/a_qhunclou",
  "revision_path": "/a/a_qhunclou/r/1",
  "cited_by": [
    {
      "id": "a_aogcpbn4",
      "revision": 1,
      "title": "A fixed ideal and the permanent work of reform",
      "url": "/a/a_aogcpbn4"
    }
  ]
}